On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 03:28:27PM -0500, Alex Roitman wrote: > Now that I read the Draft Debian Position Statement put together on the > page of Manoj Srivastava, I think we'd like to change the way our docs > are licensed. > > What would the debain-legal people suggest we use for the documentation > license instead of GFDL?
I think that Nathanael Nerode's page covers this better: http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html Basically, use the license you use for the program itself (which, if I'm not mistaken, is the GPL in this case). -- Raul
