* Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040325 12:55]: > Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > It seems rather clear that those "source" files are just machine code > > for the device firmware, and as such, are not the prefered form for > > modification.
> Agreed. So the files are not DFSG-free. Since when does the DFSG require "prefered form for modification"? Only one of the well-known licenses say that _this_ _license_ requires the prefered form as source-code. None of the other licenses say this, and the DFSG also don't require this. The question is: Are the source files the only existing form of the code (then they _are_ the source code), or are they just a result of a compiler run, and nobody will edit them (then they're not). Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
