On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 06:17:12PM -0800, Ben Reser wrote: > If the cryptlib author would state that he agrees with sleepycat's > clarifications then I don't think there are any problems with this > license.
Upon further review looks like the author has done this basically on their website (http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/cryptlib/download.html) "A good overview and background behind the Sleepycat license, which also applies for cryptlib, is also available." Which links to: http://www.winterspeak.com/columns/102901.html Which contains similar clarifications of the meaning of the Sleepycat license. So I think it's clear that the author intends to take the same interpretation of the license as Sleepycat does. -- Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://ben.reser.org "Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking." - H.L. Mencken
