On 2004-02-17 05:22:39 +0000 David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
3. The end-user documentation included with the
redistribution, if
any, must include the following acknowledgment:
"This product includes software developed by X-Oz Technologies
(http://www.x-oz.com/)."
Alternately, this acknowledgment may appear in the software
itself,
if and wherever such third-party acknowledgments normally appear.
This clause shares the problems of the new XFree86 licence. It
specifies the exact invariant wording for the non-copyright-notice
credit, is vague about what "end-user documentation" is (does the
licence count?) and doesn't specify who picks which alternate clause
applies (should state "at your choice" or similar). It may be
DFSG-free, but I would really prefer those buglets fixed.
--
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
Please http://remember.to/edit_messages on lists to be sure I read
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ gopher://g.towers.org.uk/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
