"Brian W. Carver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anthony DeRobertis writes: >> I understand that; in fact, I was one of the many people who pointed out >> that problem. But that's not what Brian said --- he said that there is a >> violation of DFSG 2 "since it does not permit 'distribution in source >> code as well as compiled form'." That's what I'd like a clarification >> of. > > Actually, if you look at my original message again, I was quoting > another list member there. I chose to quote him because I wasn't > sure I understood what he was talking about either! For further > clarification we may have to go back to the original source. (Sounds > appropriate given the topic... ;) Brian --
I, um, think he meant me, given I *did* say there is a violation of DFSG 2, since binary-only distribution is not permitted. -Brian
