On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 05:09:16PM -0500, David Turner wrote: > Incidentally, it's probable that that service as-is violates a > lot of copyright notices, by rebroadcasting the pages without > permission.
I don't think "rebroadcasting" is the right model. We saw it simply as an ultra-low-bandwidth way of accessing the Web. It acted just like any translating proxy, and it didn't even have a cache. Alternately, you could see it as performing rendering on behalf of a client device that's not capable of doing that itself. (Yeah, I know this is way off-topic :) I originally wanted to point out that interactive services still exist even at this low bandwidth, and that various notice and quine requirements can be difficult to deal with in that context.) Richard Braakman
