On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 06:14:03PM -0500, David Turner wrote: > There's a similar case in the LGPL (finding it is left as an exercise > for the reader). In practical terms, I think the FSF pretends these > glitches don't exist, and that these aren't violations. And tries to > fix them for the next version. I'll add this to my comments on the > issue.
While I am glad that the FSF is not pursing people that have run afoul of glitches, I should also point out at this point that many people besides the FSF own copyright on GPL-licensed works, and are not necessarily as inclined to be reasonable. All I'm trying to say here is that a quick fix would be nice.
