On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 11:47:52PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > * What's wrong with the GFDL and what problems can it cause
Interesting link via google:
The FOLDOC computing dictionary has been licenced to us under GFDL
without invariant sections. We have incorporated many articles
from them. Two weeks ago, somebody asked me whether the material
from our TeX article (http://www.wikipedia.com/wiki/TeX), which
was originally based on FOLDOC's but has since grown considerably,
could be reintegrated into FOLDOC. The answer is: only if they put
our Wikipedia table into the FOLDOC entry, which they are unlikely
to do because it doesn't really fit with their article formatting.
-- http://www.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikipedia-l/2002-June/002238.html
Some back-story available in:
-- http://www.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikipedia-l/2001-October/000624.html
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations --
you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''
pgpYu0QVF5XWn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
