On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 11:58, Steve Langasek wrote: > Let's see if we can build consensus around a few points. > > Does anyone here hold the position that requiring the copyright notice on > the front page would not be DFSG-free, if that's a valid interpretation > of the GPL?
Since I think something more narrowly tailored could effectively serve the same interest, I hold that it's probably not DFSG-free. But I would change my mind if I can't find a way to rewrite (2)(c) to work effectively without this (I think I can). > Does anyone believe the GPL unambiguously *dis*allows that > interpretation? I don't think so. But I do think it ambiguously diallows it -- that is, I wouldn't want to be in court trying to enforce that interpretation. -- -Dave Turner Stalk Me: 617 441 0668 "On matters of style, swim with the current, on matters of principle, stand like a rock." -Thomas Jefferson
