On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 11:52:27PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote: > I don't see anywhere that this fails the DFSG. Asking that someone must > hit such-and-such a web page with changes (and its moral equivalents) I > will buy as a violation of DFSG 5; I can't see where being forced to > provide source code (under the QPL) when asked fails, though.
I don't think being forced to actively send changes (or changelogs) upstream is any different than having to produce source on demand; both discriminate against people who *can't* publically release changes, such as people under NDA. It also places no time limit; see the first paragraph: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200201/msg00010.html -- Glenn Maynard
