On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 01:52:18AM -0600, John Galt wrote: > > No, it's legal boilerplate. You can't testify to things that AREN'T to > > the best of your knowlege. At worst it's redundant. > > Okay. > > > >> Actually it isn't a granting of right, but a Testimonial that those > > >> rights > > >> exist. It means that you have recourse if sued to go after the one > > >> making > > >> the Testimony for your costs. In Debian, a Testimony that rights exist > > >> has usually been enough to cover for a license, but the term "license" > > >> for > > >> that is rather ambiguous, I'd agree. > > Kevin, did you (or whoever wrote and is responsible for this) intend this as > a testimony?
Could you be more specific? I am not sure what you are asking.
