Will Newton writes: > No amount of license changes will prevent site administrators making their > own changes to their LaTeX installation, and I would hope major > distributors
if so then why bother to license anything at all? > would have enough respect for their users and the LaTeX community not to > make > such a gratuitous change in any case. the problem is that prior to LPPL (which is now in use for a number of years) many people were not even aware that they do something "wrong" to the community and their local users. now most of them are (at least within the LaTeX community) > No, I do not believe this is a good > argument for making a package unfree. it would certainly a bad reason to make a package unfree. my claim is that it isn't! frank -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
