On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 20:35, Daniel Lutz wrote: > Hello > > I received the mail included below from the BTS. A mail > sent to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> marked bug #89286 as > done. But the appropriate mail itself seems to be SPAM! ... > --------------------------------------- > Received: (at 89286-close) by bugs.debian.org; 1 May 2002 05:32:38 +0000 > >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 01 00:32:38 2002 > Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Received: from murphy.debian.org [65.125.64.134] > by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) > id 172mjG-0003m2-00; Wed, 01 May 2002 00:32:38 -0500 > Received: (qmail 26452 invoked from network); 1 May 2002 05:32:28 -0000 > Received: from 64-58-161-190.cbi.cox-oc.net (HELO yahoo.com) (64.58.161.190) > by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 1 May 2002 05:32:28 -0000 > From: "Chris Nunez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Introducing MultiSensit SDK > Sender: "Chris Nunez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" > Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 22:38:26 -0700 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <html> > > <body aLink=#000000 bgColor=#336699 leftMargin=0 link=#000000 text=#000000 > topMargin=0 vLink=#000000 marginheight="0" marginwidth="0"> > > <center> > <br> > > <table border="0" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" width="650" height="400"> > <tr> > <td bgcolor="#ffffff" align="center"> > <img src="http://www.mstcorporation.com/body.jpg";><br> > <font face="arial,helvetica" size="2"> > <a href="http://www.mstcorporation.com";>www.mstcorporation.com</a><br> > <a > href="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a><br>
Well, there should be enough information here to identify them. If they were in British jurisdiction, I think we could make a case for a criminal prosecution under British law for unlawfully interfering with a computer system. The website is hosted by Verio, Inc. in Colorado, USA, and the mail sent through another US ISP: Cox Communications, Inc in California. Is there anything in US Federal or state law that would support a prosecution for interfering with a computer, or maybe for criminal damage? Or perhaps we could email the spammer with a demand for compensation? -- Oliver Elphick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C "Bless them which persecute you: bless, and curse not." Romans 12:14
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
![http://www.mstcorporation.com/body.jpg"](http://www.mstcorporation.com/body.jpg"){kind=link}