On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 10:59:44PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote: > > > I think RMS's reasoning is that if you ever distribute the library > > > to A, you need to accept the contract called GPL - and in that > > > contract you promise to refrain from ever distributing to B a program > > > that links against that library and is not GPLed.
Scripsit Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > If you ever distribute a program which includes GPLed code, you need > > to respect the GPL copyright. And, if you try skirting that, there's > > also a legal principle called "contributory infringement" which makes > > skirting copyright rather difficult. On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 02:12:41PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote: > Could you elaborate on how that is different from what I describe? There's no requirement for a contract. There's no need for a two-way exchange. -- Raul
