On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, Joseph Carter wrote: > On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 12:58:32AM -0700, Michael S. Fischer wrote: > > > It's my understanding that hurd for example doesn't have this kind of > > > exception (and I suspect never will, given the project's foundation), so > > > we'll never even see apache for it (the damned BSDish advertising clause > > > strikes again!) > > > > The BSD advertising clause was removed from the license last year. > > > > See <ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/README.Impt.License.Change> for > > the official announcement. > > Ugh. Not from Apache it wasn't. The Regents of the University of > California had the right to remove it from their software and only theirs. > They don't own the rights to Apache. Not to a lot of software, in fact.
We changed ours, though. See http://www.apache.org/LICENSE. Seems to address to pragmatic issues people had with the advertising clause. Brian
