According to Joseph Carter:
> Okay guys, how about a few suggestions?
Well, you could use the term "OSI-Certified Open Source" as an
unambiguous description of open source licenses. (Unless you don't
like OSI's certifications, of course.)
--
Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"I wanted to play hopscotch with the impenetrable mystery of existence,
but he stepped in a wormhole and had to go in early." // MST3K- [[email protected]: Suggestions for wording...?] Joseph Carter
- Re: [[email protected]: Suggestions for wording...?] Chip Salzenberg
- Re: [[email protected]: Suggestions for wording..... Tomasz Wegrzanowski
- Re: [[email protected]: Suggestions for wordi... Chip Salzenberg
- Re: [[email protected]: Suggestions for wording...?] Brian Behlendorf
- Re: [[email protected]: Suggestions for wording...?] Joseph Carter
- Re: [[email protected]: Suggestions for wording..... Brian Behlendorf
- Re: [[email protected]: Suggestions for wordi... David Starner
- New Apache license compatible with GPL? (... Mark Wielaard
- Re: New Apache license compatible wit... David Starner
- Re: New Apache license compatibl... Mark Wielaard
- Re: New Apache license compatible wit... Brian Behlendorf

