On Mon, 23 May 2005, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > >They want their trademarks stripped from modified > >code that is essentially different in intent and purpose from the > >original code. > Well, that's fine; we don't want to use their trademarks for things which > aren't designed to work with their hardware, now do we? (At least, except in > a historical context, which certainly wouldn't be a trademark violation.)
What does "trademarks stripped" mean though? Does it mean they want the product not to be called <trademark>? Or do they want every single line of code that has the name in it removed, so, for instance, a help box or even code comments that say "Based on the driver for <trademark>" must be removed? And what if the trademark is used in a different context; would that be like the Apache license that prohibits you from using it in a program called "Apache Helicpoter Simulation"? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
