On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 18:09:11 -0400 Evan Prodromou wrote: > I think the two big sticking points right now are: > > * _Trademark_. I think we all consider it worth correcting, but > there are some folks who think that the problems aren't sufficient > to consider the CC licenses non-free. I'd appreciate if we can > come to some kind of compromise text. Maybe something along the > lines of, "We realize that this is not part of the license, but we > are concerned whether any of this language is binding on the > licensee or licensor. If so, we can't consider the license + > license use restrictions free."
Something similar (of course with more precise phrasing) could maybe
make everyone happy, I would think.
>
> * _Recommendation for new anti-DRM section_. I've put in a
> suggestion for having an anti-DRM clause that meets our
> requirements (free to choose who receives, free to use whatever
> format as long as parallel format available), but I'm not sure it
> meets everyone's approval. It would be good to close this off.
The one in version 4 seems viable:
| You may not distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or
| publicly digitally perform the Work with any technological measures
| that prevent the recipient from exercising the rights granted to them
| by section 8a and section 3 of this License, unless you also
| distribute, publicly display, publicly perform or publicly digitally
| perform the Work for the same recipient without those measures.
>
> Otherwise, I think we're doing well. Thanks to everyone who's
> commented.
You're welcome. :)
--
:-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-)
......................................................................
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgpRpPr53FQxR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
