As I recall, there was language about "official builds" of Firefox.
So it wouldn't seem to be binding on us. -- John On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 10:51:04AM -0500, William Ballard wrote: > I don't know what to make of this statement: > > http://news.zdnet.co.uk/0,39020330,39189475,00.htm > [quote] > The main disadvantage of the deal with Google is that native language > versions of Firefox are not permitted to change the default search > engine to one that is more useful for searching Web pages in a > particular language.[/quote] > > I don't want to be a chicken little, but in what sense is this statement > valid? It seems to have extraordinary implications, not in the least > that Firefox and Mozilla would have to be considered Non-Free. > > Is it merely advistory or a request? I know there was some talk about > Debian Thunderbird; here's some more fuel for the fire! > > What gives? > > [If this gets moved to [EMAIL PROTECTED], cc me, b/c I'm not on that list.) > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
