MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When you contacted debian-legal about this licence last month, the > general opinion seemed to be that each case needed checking. > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/12/msg00002.html > * not to find out what changed between draft and final versions, I made some files for you: http://people.cc.jyu.fi/~juhtolv/stuff/txt/CDDL/ - cddl_license.draft.txt : Copypasted this to text editor: http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:mss:9125:200412:dmcacncfamieofeochbn - cddl_license.txt : Same as this: http://www.opensolaris.org/license/cddl_license.txt - wdiff.n1.txt : Output of: wdiff -n1 cddl_license.draft.txt cddl_license.txt - wdiff.n2.txt : Output of: wdiff -n2 cddl_license.draft.txt cddl_license.txt - wdiff.n3.txt : Output of: wdiff -n3 cddl_license.draft.txt cddl_license.txt - wdiff_sed.txt : Output of: wdiff -1n cddl_license.draft.txt cddl_license.txt | sed -e 's/^/ /;/{+/s/^/|/;s/{+//g;s/+}//g' HTH > * not to tell us what software under CDDL you intend to package. I am not going to package any software under that license. I just want to know, if installing, running and using software under such license is ethically right thing to do. And I think I am not the only one pondering such ethical question: For example many of you may have accounts to Sun Solaris systems and sooner or later they may be upgraded to version 10. -- Juhapekka "naula" Tolvanen * http colon slash slash iki dot fi slash juhtolv "sinun kauneutesi kaataa valtakuntia. minun pimeyteni raiskaa runoutta." CMX -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
