On 2025-01-02 19:37, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 02.01.25 19:04, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > On 2023-02-05 16:41, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 03:31:43PM +0100, Bastian Germann wrote: > > > > On Tue, 08 Nov 2022 21:18:06 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > > gcc-11 should not be shipped in bookworm. > > > > > > > > Maybe it is okay for the gcc-11 packages that cannot move to gcc-12 to > > > > go back to gcc-10? > > > > I guess, gcc-10 is not as easy to get out because of the gcc-plugin and > > > > gnat stuff that is > > > > not replaceable by gcc-11 or gcc-12. > > > > ... > > > > > > None of these are in bookworm. > > > > > > The complete list of packages in bookworm still using gcc-10 is: > > > - grub2 > > > - shim > > > - simde (fixed in unstable) > > > > It appears that nothing besides the gcc-11-cross* packages > > (Build-)Depends on gcc-11 in trixie and unstable. I guess we should > > reassign the bug to ftp.debian.org for package removal? > > please keep it still in unstable, it's already removed in testing. >
Do we really need to keep 6 GCC versions in the archive? Regards Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://aurel32.net
