Package: g++-13 Version: 13-20221214-1 Severity: serious Hi Matthias,
thanks for pushing gcc-13 into experimental already. That leaves plenty of time to work on it. I've located a quite fundamental problem with it already: $ cat test.c++ #include <stdio.h> $ g++-13 -c test.c++ In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:430, from test.c++:1: /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/floatn.h:87:9: error: multiple types in one declaration 87 | typedef __float128 _Float128; | ^~~~~~~~~~ /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/floatn.h:87:20: error: declaration does not declare anything [-fpermissive] 87 | typedef __float128 _Float128; | ^~~~~~~~~ In file included from /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/floatn.h:120: /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/floatn-common.h:214:9: error: multiple types in one declaration 214 | typedef float _Float32; | ^~~~~ /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/floatn-common.h:214:15: error: declaration does not declare anything [-fpermissive] 214 | typedef float _Float32; | ^~~~~~~~ /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/floatn-common.h:251:9: error: multiple types in one declaration 251 | typedef double _Float64; | ^~~~~~ /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/floatn-common.h:251:16: error: declaration does not declare anything [-fpermissive] 251 | typedef double _Float64; | ^~~~~~~~ /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/floatn-common.h:268:9: error: multiple types in one declaration 268 | typedef double _Float32x; | ^~~~~~ /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/floatn-common.h:268:16: error: declaration does not declare anything [-fpermissive] 268 | typedef double _Float32x; | ^~~~~~~~~ /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/floatn-common.h:285:14: error: multiple types in one declaration 285 | typedef long double _Float64x; | ^~~~~~ /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/floatn-common.h:285:21: error: declaration does not declare anything [-fpermissive] 285 | typedef long double _Float64x; | ^~~~~~~~~ $ Jakub Jelinek kindly pointed out that bits/floatn.h and bits/floatn-common.h should be fixincluded. I can see that this is happening in a build log and that those fixed includes are not contained in any binary package. As such, this is not considered an upstream problem. I see that the packaging deletes include-fixed and fail to understand why that happens at this time. Do you have a better understanding? Helmut