Your message dated Tue, 13 Jul 2021 16:51:40 +0200
with message-id <ca22befe-7ef7-825f-874d-3065d942b...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: gcc-11 should (build) depend on binutils (>= 2.36)
has caused the Debian Bug report #991050,
regarding gcc-11 should (build) depend on binutils (>= 2.36)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
991050: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991050
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gcc-11
Severity: serious
Helmut Grohne reported on IRC:
when gcc-11 is built with experimental binutils, the binary packages
do not work with unstable binutils by passing unrecognized options
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-11/changes.html confirms that gcc 11
might optionally use binutils 2.36 functionality.
Please bump runtime and build dependencies on binutils to 2.36.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
No, 2.36 is not required. Perfectly fine to build with 2.35.2.
--- End Message ---
