Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2019 10:00:21 +0000 with message-id <e1gmfkx-000b2o...@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#920166: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #807830, regarding arm: -fstack-protector-strong adds dependency on ld-linux-aarch64.so.1 on arm64 to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 807830: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=807830 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: gcc-5 Version: 5.3.1-3 Severity: normal Hello, I'm not sure if gcc is the right package to report this problem for, but not knowing it better I picked gcc, please reassign if needed. In the buildlog of memtool on arm64[1] I found a message: dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/memtool/usr/sbin/memtool was not linked against ld-linux-aarch64.so.1 (it uses none of the library's symbols) This is surprising because ld-linux-aarch64.so.1 isn't mentioned explicitly and it should only be pulled in when needed: (sid_arm64-dchroot)ukleinek@asachi:~$ cat /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc.so /* GNU ld script Use the shared library, but some functions are only in the static library, so try that secondarily. */ OUTPUT_FORMAT(elf64-littleaarch64) GROUP ( /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 /usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc_nonshared.a AS_NEEDED ( /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-aarch64.so.1 ) ) The same problem (of course with a different lib name) is logged in the armhf and armel build logs. This is reproducible on asachi.debian.org in a sid chroot and only if -fstack-protector-strong is passed: (sid_arm64-dchroot)ukleinek@asachi:~$ cat test.c #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> int main(int argc, char **argv) { char *end; unsigned long long val = strtoull(argv[1], &end, 0); printf("Hello World! %llu\n", val); return EXIT_SUCCESS; } (sid_arm64-dchroot)ukleinek@asachi:~$ gcc -fstack-protector-strong -o test test.c; objdump -p test | grep NEEDED NEEDED libc.so.6 NEEDED ld-linux-aarch64.so.1 (sid_arm64-dchroot)ukleinek@asachi:~$ gcc -o test test.c; objdump -p test | grep NEEDED NEEDED libc.so.6 I would expect that adding -fstack-protector-strong shouldn't introduce a useless dependency to ld-linux-aarch64.so.1. So either this dependency is unused (in which case there is something wrong in the linker) or dpkg-shlibdeps' diagnose is wrong (then dpkg-shlibdeps should be fixed and this bug reassigned accordingly). Best regards Uwe [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=memtool&arch=arm64&ver=2015.12.2-1&stamp=1449831548 -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: arm64 (aarch64) Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-arm64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: unable to detect Versions of packages gcc-5 depends on: ii binutils 2.25.90.20151125-2 ii cpp-5 5.3.1-3 ii gcc-5-base 5.3.1-3 ii libc6 2.21-3 ii libcc1-0 5.3.1-3 ii libgcc-5-dev 5.3.1-3 ii libgcc1 1:5.3.1-3 ii libgmp10 2:6.1.0+dfsg-2 ii libisl15 0.15-3 ii libmpc3 1.0.3-1 ii libmpfr4 3.1.3-1 ii libstdc++6 5.3.1-3 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-2+b1 Versions of packages gcc-5 recommends: ii libc6-dev 2.21-3 Versions of packages gcc-5 suggests: pn gcc-5-doc <none> pn gcc-5-locales <none> pn libasan2-dbg <none> pn libatomic1-dbg <none> pn libcilkrts5-dbg <none> pn libgcc1-dbg <none> pn libgomp1-dbg <none> pn libitm1-dbg <none> pn liblsan0-dbg <none> pn libmpx0-dbg <none> pn libquadmath-dbg <none> pn libtsan0-dbg <none> pn libubsan0-dbg <none> -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Version: 5.5.0-12+rm Dear submitter, as the package gcc-5 has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/920166 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
