On 03/05/2018 09:51, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 03.05.2018 09:03, Alastair McKinstry wrote: >> On 03/05/2018 08:43, Matthias Klose wrote: >> >>> On 03.05.2018 07:29, Alastair McKinstry wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> FTBFS bugs haveveen filed for packages that fail under gcc8. >>> I didn't file any, and I didn't see any being filed. Which ones do you mean? >> They were filed by Lucas Nussbaum, e.g. #897518, #897507, >> these use grib_api.mod from libeccodes-dev. >> These fail because they need eccodes-dev to be built with gfortran8. >> >> Others will use netcdf.mod , etc. > I can't see any gfortran-8 involvement for these issues.
My error, sorry (but we still need to plan the gfortran-8 transition). What happened here is that I moved the .mod file in libeccodes-dev to /usr/include/$ARCH, to make the package multi-arch capable. While gcc looks there for header files, gfortran does _not_, which is inconsistent and a challenge. Is this deliberate, or will a patch to multiarch-enable gfortran be accepted ? -- Alastair McKinstry, <alast...@sceal.ie>, <mckins...@debian.org>, https://diaspora.sceal.ie/u/amckinstry Misentropy: doubting that the Universe is becoming more disordered.
