Your message dated Sun, 18 Feb 2018 15:40:57 +0700 with message-id <401782a1-f6bf-6db7-38a6-fcae0a489...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#890724: gcc-7: redundant base packages has caused the Debian Bug report #890724, regarding gcc-7: redundant base packages to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 890724: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=890724 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: gcc-7 Version: 7.3.0-3 Severity: normal The files in these packages seem to be essentially duplicates of each other. Is this really necessary? # deborphan gcc-6-base gcc-7-base gcc-8-base gcc-6-base libgcj17 gcj-6-jre-headless gcj-6-jre-lib libgcj17-awt gcj-6-jre gcc-7-base libasan4 libgfortran4 gcc-7 g++-7 libcilkrts5 libubsan0 libgcc-7-dev cpp-7 libstdc++-7-dev libobjc-7-dev gcc-8-base libquadmath0 libgomp1 libatomic1 libcc1-0 libobjc4 libtsan0 liblsan0 libmpx2 libstdc++6 lib32stdc++6 libitm1 libgcc1 lib32gcc1 -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.14.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_CA.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_CA.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages gcc-7 depends on: ii binutils 2.30-4 ii cpp-7 7.3.0-3 ii gcc-7-base 7.3.0-3 ii libc6 2.26-4 ii libcc1-0 8-20180207-2 ii libgcc-7-dev 7.3.0-3 ii libgcc1 1:8-20180207-2 ii libgmp10 2:6.1.2+dfsg-2 ii libisl15 0.18-1 ii libmpc3 1.1.0-1 ii libmpfr6 4.0.0-7 ii libstdc++6 8-20180207-2 ii zlib1g 1:1.2.8.dfsg-5 Versions of packages gcc-7 recommends: ii libc6-dev 2.26-4 Versions of packages gcc-7 suggests: ii gcc-7-doc 7.2.0-1 pn gcc-7-locales <none> pn gcc-7-multilib <none> pn libasan4-dbg <none> pn libatomic1-dbg <none> pn libcilkrts5-dbg <none> pn libgcc1-dbg <none> pn libgomp1-dbg <none> pn libitm1-dbg <none> pn liblsan0-dbg <none> pn libmpx2-dbg <none> pn libquadmath0-dbg <none> pn libtsan0-dbg <none> pn libubsan0-dbg <none> -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On 18.02.2018 08:10, Ian Bruce wrote: > Package: gcc-7 > Version: 7.3.0-3 > Severity: normal > > The files in these packages seem to be essentially duplicates of each > other. Is this really necessary? No, they might be different, and are required by Debian policy, because we cannot ship symlinks to doc dirs for packages built from a different source package.
--- End Message ---
