On 06/01/2015 03:40 PM, John David Anglin wrote: > On 2015-06-01 9:24 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: >> On 05/30/2015 10:59 PM, John David Anglin wrote: >>> On 2015-05-29, at 5:18 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: >>> >>>> Anyway, please check if this is the real cause. attaching a hack which >>>> should >>>> work around that. >>> The hack didn't fix build. Here is log: >>> http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-5&arch=hppa&ver=5.1.1-9&stamp=1433017924 >>> >> yep, here is what I'm checking in. should be good enough for hppa64. >> >> Index: b/src/configure.ac >> =================================================================== >> --- a/src/configure.ac >> +++ b/src/configure.ac >> @@ -147,6 +147,11 @@ libgcj="target-libffi \ >> target-zlib \ >> target-libjava" >> >> +case x"${target}" in > Do we need the x?
probably not. > It seems libiberty was explicitly omitted as a target library. yes, this is one of the oddities of the local gnat patches. There seem to be some assumptions, but some of them are apparently only valid for the native builds. I hope Ludovic will have some time to look at these patches. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/556c6422.8000...@debian.org
