On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 04:42:37PM -0500, wrote: > I am seeing something very confusing with the gcc-4.9 source package. > > On jessie, gcc-4.9 is currentl version 4.9.1-19. However if you do > 'apt-get source gcc-4.9' it gives you 4.9.2-4. For some reason the > Sources.xz for jessie contains entries for gcc-4.9 with versions: > Version: 4.9.1-3 > Standards-Version: 3.9.5 > Version: 4.9.1-8 > Standards-Version: 3.9.5 > Version: 4.9.1-9 > Standards-Version: 3.9.5 > Version: 4.9.1-14 > Standards-Version: 3.9.5 > Version: 4.9.1-15 > Standards-Version: 3.9.5 > Version: 4.9.1-16 > Standards-Version: 3.9.5 > Version: 4.9.1-17 > Standards-Version: 3.9.5 > Version: 4.9.1-18 > Standards-Version: 3.9.5 > Version: 4.9.1-19 > Standards-Version: 3.9.5 > Version: 4.9.2-2 > Standards-Version: 3.9.6 > Version: 4.9.2-3 > Standards-Version: 3.9.6 > Version: 4.9.2-4 > Standards-Version: 3.9.6 > > I was expecting just 4.9.1-19 to be there. > > In adddition to that, if you ask 'apt-cache showsrc gcc-4.9', you > see the Build-Dep for 4.9.2-4 as needing binutils 2.24.90.20141128, > but if you look at the debian/control in 4.9.2-4 (that it downloaded), > the binutils build-dep is in fact 2.23.52. How did it get that wrong > in the Sources.xz? > > So any idea what has gone wrong with the archive maintainance tools for > jessie and how to get it fixed? For that matter, why are the 4.9.2-4 > sources still in the archive, if no release currently uses it (sid is > 4.9.2-10 and jessie is 4.9.1-19. The rest would seem like they should > no longer exist other than on the snapshot server. Currently the list > of .dsc files for gcc-4.9 in the archive is: > > gcc-4.9_4.9.1-3.dsc > gcc-4.9_4.9.1-7.dsc > gcc-4.9_4.9.1-8.dsc > gcc-4.9_4.9.1-9.dsc > gcc-4.9_4.9.1-14.dsc > gcc-4.9_4.9.1-15.dsc > gcc-4.9_4.9.1-16.dsc > gcc-4.9_4.9.1-17.dsc > gcc-4.9_4.9.1-18.dsc > gcc-4.9_4.9.1-19.dsc > gcc-4.9_4.9.2-2.dsc > gcc-4.9_4.9.2-3.dsc > gcc-4.9_4.9.2-4.dsc > gcc-4.9_4.9.2-5.dsc > gcc-4.9_4.9.2-10.dsc > > That seems a lot longer than one would normally expect to see for > a package. > > So if you ask jessie to get the sources for gcc-4.9, it gets the wrong > version, and it can't install the build-dep for it because it has the > wrong build-dep data too. > > (Please CC me on replies, since I am not on this list).
Having not had any replies to this, I can only assume I should file a FTBFS against gcc-4.9 in jessie to get something done about it. -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150305220405.ga24...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
