Am 20.08.2014 um 22:12 schrieb Svante Signell: > On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 10:48 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: >> Svante Signell, le Wed 21 May 2014 10:44:54 +0200, a écrit : >>> On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 10:33 +0200, Arnaud Charlet wrote: >>>>>> I think the majority of work has bee done, Now that patch will change >>>>>> slightly for every missing feature added to Hurd. >>>>> >>>>> Then it's all good, it's a matter of what I said above. >>>> >>>> Don't forget also the part where general changes are done in GNAT which >>>> require update to target specific files: these typically require someone >>>> to regularly test each port to detect any missing update, and report/fix >>>> them, even if GNU/Hurd hasn't changed itself. >>> >>> With the help from the dabian-ada people, especially Ludovic Brenta, >>> gnat has been running on GNU/Hurd in Debian since gcc/gnat-4.6.3. >> >> Then it's all good. Just say that you wish to continue maintaining >> things like this, and upstream will be happy. > > Attached is the updated ada-hurd.diff patch for GNU/Hurd. It builds fine > with gnat-4.9.1-1 and gcc-4.9.1-7. This patch now has the same amount of > files as the kFreeBSD patch. Hopefully it can be material for upstream, > but at least in Debian the Hurd port would be on par with kFreeBSD. > Regarding remaining code commented out or irrelevant comments in the new > file s-osinte-gnu.ads, please help me to iron out the left-overs.
the patch is at least missing the ChangeLog entry. Also it is only tested using the Debian package based on the 4.9 branch, and which includes a bunch of local ada patches which are not forwarded upstream for years. Please prepare and test your patch with current trunk for upstream submission. > Ludovic, can you consider using this file as ada-hurd.diff for next > upload of Debian gnat-4.9? > > For clarity: I wish to continue to maintain the Ada port for Hurd, with > the help of the Debian Ada and Hurd people, with or without being > imported upstream. I disagree. Debian's current local ada patches are a mess, and no effort is made to cleanup these and forward these upstream. If the Debian Ada people can't do this, please do it yourself. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/540212a0.9010...@debian.org
