Your message dated Fri, 16 May 2014 13:44:43 +0200
with message-id <5375fa2b.8090...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#748317: libstdc++6: Pretty-printers don't support
Python 3
has caused the Debian Bug report #748317,
regarding libstdc++6: Pretty-printers don't support Python 3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
748317: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=748317
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libstdc++6
Version: 4.9.0-3
Severity: important
Control: affects -1 gdb
Dear doko,
On May 6, you NMU'd gdb to make it build against Python 3. Which would
be all well and good, except for one thing: the pretty-printers for
libstdc++ are *still* using Python 2 syntax.
(Any particular reason you couldn't have updated the printers to be
python3-compatible *before* doing the NMU?)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.11-2-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages libstdc++6 depends on:
ii gcc-4.9-base 4.9.0-3
ii libc6 2.18-4
ii libgcc1 1:4.9.0-3
ii multiarch-support 2.17-97
libstdc++6 recommends no packages.
libstdc++6 suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 4.9.0-3
Am 16.05.2014 03:52, schrieb Samuel Bronson:
> On May 6, you NMU'd gdb to make it build against Python 3. Which would
> be all well and good, except for one thing: the pretty-printers for
> libstdc++ are *still* using Python 2 syntax.
>
> (Any particular reason you couldn't have updated the printers to be
> python3-compatible *before* doing the NMU?)
They are. Please check before filing such reports. If there is a problem, please
report it properly. I don't think the style of this report is the best way
forward.
--- End Message ---
