http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19430
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|V_MAY_DEF (taking address |taking address of a var
|of var) causes missing |causes missing
|uninitialized warning |uninitialized warning
Severity|minor |enhancement
--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Well, fact is we still don't have the machinery that warns for the use of
uninitialized memory - and we never had. The cases that work by
accident are for loads that alias-analysis can prove we can move to
the function entry (well, a little less than that).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/bug-19430-5724-cqep5fs...@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
