Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org> writes: > Am 30.05.2013 12:24, schrieb Ansgar Burchardt: >> gcj-4.8 build-depends on gcc-4.8-source, but does not indicate so via >> Built-Using. >> >> Alternatively include the source in gcj-4.8 itself as was done in the >> upload that passed NEW[1], but was reverted in the next upload. >> >> [1] <http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gcj-4.8/news/20130224T170009Z.html> > > as soon as the policy allows > > Built-Using: gcc-4.8-source (>= 4.8.0), gcc-4.8-source (<< 4.8.1) > > enforcing a strict dependency for no reason doesn't make sense, please improve > your implementation for using the loose dependencies.
You never explained what problem you are trying to fix even though I asked multiple times. So I don't see any reason to change this. Also having binary packages there instead of source packages only makes me suspect you misunderstand what the field does. Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8761xy8br5....@eisei.43-1.org
