On 13.05.2012 21:58, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 13.05.2012 18:42, Matthias Klose wrote: >> On 13.05.2012 21:22, Julien Cristau wrote: >>> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 18:58:42 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: >>>> which ones? are there any reports which are not tagged? I went through >>>> the list of Lucas' new batch and tagged the appropriate ones. >>>> >>> There were again some more in the last couple days. They should be tagged >>> AFAIK. >> >> I am only aware of these usertags: >> debian...@lists.debian.org / qa-ftbfs-20120508 >> do you known about a new rebuild? > > From a trivial look the set from #672397 onwards on the usertagged bug list > were > all filed in the past three days.
looking at 98 and 99 this doesn't seem to be a "set". 97 needs a fix in boost, but can be worked around by merkatoor building with -fpermissive. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fb0bddf.1040...@debian.org
