Samuel Bronson <naes...@gmail.com> writes: > We appreciate that the Debian project is even more zealous about free > software than RMS himself, and recognize that the GFDL, when used with > invariant sections and/or cover texts, is not totally free. > > Nevertheless, for practical reasons, we really do want that manual. So, > pretty please (with a cherry on top!) won't you upload it to non-free?
Isn't uploading GFDL stuff to non-free a bit of like throwing salt in the wound (for the FSF, which vehemently hates non-free because of the various proprietary packages there)? [Ok, maybe some would consider that an _advantage_, but one can hope for a little diplomacy...] Maybe there should be separate "kinda-non-free-but-opinions-differ" and "really-really-non-free-nope-not-even-a-little" sections. :} -miles -- Cat, n. A soft, indestructible automaton provided by nature to be kicked when things go wrong in the domestic circle. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ty7ihfc7....@catnip.gol.com
