On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:01:20AM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote: > * Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be> [101114 14:08]: > > People have been claiming that constructors or init section are a > > possible problem. I have yet to see an example where it breaks. > > The following example is a bit constructed, but shows a silent change > of run-time behaviour if --as-needed is passed: [...] > # Try it again and it fails now...
So you're basicly saying that an otherwise unused library's init section also has an effect. I'm not at all suprised by that, and that's not what I understood people were talking about. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101116174954.ga...@roeckx.be
