On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 11:55:28AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 01:47:09PM +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote: > > The fix Matthias reffered to, is that you no longer need to pass -pthread > > explicitly if your program does not use pthreads. Please try it out -- > > it should not complain about pthread_cancel. > > Well, my program uses pthreads, so it's not a relevant fix. In any case, good > that it's fixed.
I see, thanks. I asked because your original sympthom (about pthread_cancel) was very similiar to mine. Just a note - if your program uses pthread you should pass -pthread explicitly, even if some other library you link to uses pthread, because with -Wl,-no-add-needed (which is the default in Fedora, and may be some time in Debian too) you'll get link errors. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UnderstandingDSOLinkChange > > As to -flto -- I can't say, but could you please provide self-contained > > testcase, preferably minimized, so we could try it out by ourselves too. > > I can give you a test case, but I'm afraid I cannot make it public. (Also, > it's pretty hard to disentangle, I'm afraid.) Let me know if it would be > helpful to you. No thanks, I can't afford NDA for myself. Though I may suggest to try latest upstream binutils and gcc-4.5 to see whether it works there, and if not, try harder to still disentangle the testcase. Thanks, Kirill -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100808102038.gc8...@landau.phys.spbu.ru
