Bug#472867: more simplier loop (asm x86 corrected)

[Cyprien LAPLACE]

Florian Weimer a écrit :
* Cyprien LAPLACE:
  
Hum, well .. another sample test:

/* c.c */

extern void func(void*);

void test()
{
    register char (*foo)[32] = (typeof(foo))0-1024;
    register int index;
    for(index=0;index<1024;index++) {
        func(foo++);
    }
}
    

This is still undefined.  If you need machine address arithmetic, you
should use uintptr_t and hope for the best.
  

Does it mean that the loop indexed on an integer should become an 
infinite loop ?



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]