Lucas Nussbaum writes: > On 24/01/08 at 01:42 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > I did upgrade all reports mentioned in [2] to severity `important'. My > > current plan is to make gcc-4.3/g++-4.3 the default compiler once the > > gcc-4_3-release branch is created, for all architectures where we had > > sucessful rebuilds with GCC-4.3 as the default compiler. These bug > > reports will be raised to severity `serious' at this time. > > Hi Matthias, > > What's your definition for a "successful rebuild with gcc-4.3"? Even on > i386, there are still a lot of packages that build fine with gcc-4.2, > but fail to build with gcc-4.3.
All packages rebuilt, except for failures where bug reports are already filed but not yet fixed. It's a chicken and egg problem getting these known bugs fixed. My plan is to announce a date for the move to gcc-4.3 and then raise the severity of those reports at this date. > Also, does your plan include a move to gcj-4.3 as well? already moved; it's just the backend which did change. The frontend and the libraries are the same. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
