Matthias Klose writes: > I did have a look at Camm's packages on p.d.o., fixed some obvious > things and uploaded those to unstable; Camm did change all package > names and the soname of all libraries, such that these packages do not > conflict with the existing packages in unstable, therefore the > decision to upload those to unstable.
Thanks for this! > - use the unversioned compiler again for all of blas, lapack, atlas. > > - don't use -ffloat-store in the blas build (currently ix86 only) > > - update lapack to 3.1 About Lapack, I have this to say; if you recall, you uploaded a lapack I prepared in October to experimental (version 3.1); why not try that in experimental with the new Blas? Please note that the current Blas in unstable which you uploaded yesterday is the new upstream version, which _borrows_ some code from the new lapack, so I am wondering if it would be a good idea to build the old Lapack against the new Blas. Also, the new upstream Lapack has several of Camm's old patches applied upstream, so I am wondering what strategy can be adopted to counter this, as I really don't know which patches to keep, which not to. Finally, another very important TODO: Update Atlas to 3.8.0: https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=23725 Thanks. Kumar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
