------- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 09:57 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Hmm, isn't movl %eax, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a valid way to have an > offset?
gas accepts that as valid so I think GCC should accept this. I am now going to bed but I am also going to say this is a latent bug in the x86 back-end. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29825 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
