Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> * Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-19 22:44]:
>> I can reproduce this with gcc-snapshot, but not with 4.2.0 20060304,
>> so it's probably fixed already, at least on mainline.
>
> If you can not reproduce it with 4.2.0, does this mean that a future
> version of 4._1_ will contain the fix?  Is that what you mean with
> mainline, or do you mean 4.2 mainline?

I mean 4.2 mainline. I don't know yet whether 4.1 mainline is fixed.
I'm pretty sure if it isn't already, it will get fixed.

-- 
        Falk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to