Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:16:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Please make libstdc++6-dev standard and libstdc++5-3.3-dev
optional
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2005 21:57:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 10 14:57:27 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E2yZj-0008T4-00; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:57:27 -0700
Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E2yZh-0006OE-8y
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:57:25 +0200
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:57:25 +0200
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Please make libstdc++6-dev standard and libstdc++5-3.3-dev optional
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-No-CC: Please respect my Mail-Followup-To header
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: ftp.debian.org,libstdc++6-dev,libstdc++5-3.3-dev
Severity: minor
Hello,
I think that the priorities of libstdc++5-3.3-dev and libstdc++6-dev
should be interchanged now that GCC 4.0 is our default compiler. So:
libstdc++5-3.3-dev: standard -> optional
libstdc++6-dev: optional -> standard
Thanks.
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
We learned that the Linux load average rolls over at 1024. And we
actually found this out empirically.
-- H. Peter Anvin from kernel.org
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 322482-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 23:16:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 16:16:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from a-eskwadraat.nl [131.211.39.72]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EExXL-0003a2-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:16:31 -0700
Received: from 220pc220.sshunet.nl
([145.97.220.220] helo=mordor.wolffelaar.nl ident=Debian-exim)
by a-eskwadraat.nl with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1EExXK-0000MX-RY; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:16:30 +0200
Received: from jeroen by mordor.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EExXK-0007Je-Fl; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:16:30 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:16:30 +0200
To: Adeodato =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sim=F3?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Please make libstdc++6-dev standard and libstdc++5-3.3-dev optional
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 11:57:25PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Package: ftp.debian.org,libstdc++6-dev,libstdc++5-3.3-dev
> Severity: minor
>
> Hello,
>
> I think that the priorities of libstdc++5-3.3-dev and libstdc++6-dev
> should be interchanged now that GCC 4.0 is our default compiler. So:
>
> libstdc++5-3.3-dev: standard -> optional
> libstdc++6-dev: optional -> standard
Well, libstdc++6-4.0-dev, but I did those yesterday.
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
