Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:33:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in gcc-3.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Aug 2003 02:40:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 26 21:40:51 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (seal.fluffyspider.com.au) [203.206.217.82]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19rqEt-0008Es-00; Tue, 26 Aug 2003 21:40:51 -0500
Received: from clam.fluffyspider.com.au ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.168.12.28])
by seal.fluffyspider.com.au (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.4) with ESMTP id
h7R2elX9021680;
Wed, 27 Aug 2003 12:40:47 +1000
Received: from akumria by clam.fluffyspider.com.au with local (Exim 3.36 #1
(Debian))
id 19rqEp-0001Hb-00; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 12:40:47 +1000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gcc-3.3: gcc version selection doesn't work as expected
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.24
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 12:40:46 +1000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE,RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_17
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre1
Severity: normal
Hi there,
I only discovered recently that gcc has a '-V' argument to select the version
of the compiler to be used for compilation. It'd be great if the third command
listed here also worked. For the record I have gcc-2.95, gcc-3.0, gcc-3.2
and gcc-3.3 all installed. I'm filling this bug against gcc-3.3 as apparently
this feature is dependant on the last gcc version installed.
Thanks,
Anand
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [~] $ 589 gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.3.2 20030812 (Debian prerelease)
Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [~] $ 590 gcc -V 3.3 --version
i486-linux-gcc-3.3 (GCC) 3.3.2 20030812 (Debian prerelease)
Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [~] $ 591 gcc -V 3.2 --version
gcc: couldn't run `i486-linux-gcc-3.2': No such file or directory
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [~] $ 592 gcc-3.2 --version
gcc-3.2 (GCC) 3.2.3 (Debian)
Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux clam 2.6.0-test2 #18 Mon Jul 28 13:13:56 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages gcc-3.3 depends on:
ii binutils 2.14.90.0.5-0.2 The GNU assembler, linker and bina
ii cpp-3.3 1:3.3.2-0pre1 The GNU C preprocessor
ii gcc-3.3-base 1:3.3.2-0pre1 The GNU Compiler Collection (base
ii libc6 2.3.2-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:3.3.2-0pre1 GCC support library
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 207444-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jun 2005 22:33:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 27 15:33:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dn2Aw-00057w-00; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:33:59 -0700
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA19844
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:33:56 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55148F2B9
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:33:56 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
id 21566-23 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:33:56 +0200 (MEST) 14104
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:33:55 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id j5RMXtma004126;
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:33:55 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:33:55 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed in gcc-3.3
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
as pointed out in the bug trace, fixed in gcc-3.3.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
