reassign 280803 gcc-4.0-doc thanks, control, and have a nice day Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Brian M. Carlson writes: >> Package: libgcc1 >> Version: 1:4.0-0pre0 >> Severity: serious >> >> The copyright file includes a copy of the GNU Free Documentation >> License, which has been judged by debian-legal to be >> non-free. Please remove the non-free material from the package or >> move the package to non-free. > > I do not want to believe that debian-legal judges such nonsense, > i.e. to distribute a licence file with a non DFSG license. It's > clearly marked which license terms hold for the libgcc_s.so.1. > > Matthias > I apologize; I was imprecise. The licenses of license files are irrelevant, but the licenses of documentation are not, and this bug should rightly have been filed against gcc-4.0-doc, assuming that the copyright file which is included in the libgcc1 package applies to that package as well. Personally, I think only those licenses that belong to a certain package should be in that package's copyright file, but that's for someone else to argue. Anyone? For the record, I did the following: grep 'Free Documentation License' `find /usr/share/doc/ -name copyright` and libgcc1 showed up.
