daniel writes:
> Package: gcj-3.3
> Version: 1:3.3.4-6sarge1
> Severity: normal
>
>
> At the moment libgcj4-dev (>= 1:3.3.4-6sarge1) appears in recommands
> only. Unless I missed something, that makes gcj mostly unusable when
> the dependendy is not fullfilled.
>
> For instance, I recently upgraded gcj-3.3 from testing. Since
> libgcj4-dev is not a depends, and pulled new packages (libgcj4-common),
> it was not upgraded. Then gcj would fail with:
will add an dependency of libgcj4-common to gcj-3.3. For byte-code
compilations a dependencya on libgcj4-dev is unneeded.
Matthias
