Your message dated Tue, 20 Jul 2004 22:08:17 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#260321: info gcc brings up gccint-3.3, not gcc-3.3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jul 2004 21:45:19 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 19 14:45:19 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from as2-1-6.lh.m.bonet.se (osk.mine.nu) [194.236.130.162] (Debian-exim) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bmfwl-0007CK-00; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:45:19 -0700 Received: from oskar ([192.168.1.2] ident=usel) by osk.mine.nu with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bmfwg-0004nU-GV; Mon, 19 Jul 2004 23:45:14 +0200 Received: by oskar (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 19 Jul 2004 23:45:14 +0200 From: "Oskar Liljeblad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: info gcc brings up gccint-3.3, not gcc-3.3 Bcc: Oskar Liljeblad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: reportbug 2.62 Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 23:45:14 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: gcc-3.3-doc Version: 1:3.3.4-2 Severity: wishlist Typing 'info gcc' shows you the gccint-3.3 info page instead of the gcc-3.3 one. I think it is much more common to browse the non-internal GCC documentation so that should probably be the default. If possible, that is. I don't know where this is controlled. Regards, Oskar Liljeblad ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_GB Versions of packages gcc-3.3-doc depends on: ii gcc-3.3-base 1:3.3.4-2 The GNU Compiler Collection (base -- no debconf information --------------------------------------- Received: (at 260321-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jul 2004 03:22:36 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 20 20:22:36 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bn7gi-0004zZ-00; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 20:22:36 -0700 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA03022 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 05:22:33 +0200 (MEST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id i6KK8H81018989; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 22:08:17 +0200 (MEST) From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 22:08:17 +0200 To: "Oskar Liljeblad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#260321: info gcc brings up gccint-3.3, not gcc-3.3 In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Oskar Liljeblad writes: > Package: gcc-3.3-doc > Version: 1:3.3.4-2 > Severity: wishlist > > Typing 'info gcc' shows you the gccint-3.3 info page instead > of the gcc-3.3 one. I think it is much more common to browse > the non-internal GCC documentation so that should probably > be the default. If possible, that is. I don't know where this > is controlled. please install the gcc-doc package.