On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Grant Grundler wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 08:11:46PM +0300, Martin-?ric Racine wrote: > > Wasn't PALO (the bootloader) also build-dependant upon 3.0 at some point? > > Not really. It was a coincendence palo built with gcc 3.0 worked > and palo built with later gcc didn't. The bug was in palo and I'm > pretty sure paul fixed it in palo 1.5.
OK, good to know. Do I assume that there's nothing left that prevents 3.3 from becoming the default compiler on hppa, then? -- Martin-Éric Racine, ICT Consultant http://www.iki.fi/q-funk/
