reassign 218710 gnumeric
thanks
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 10:02:09AM +0100, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 03:12:14 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > I wasn't able to reproduce this issue you reported (FTBFS with gcc 2.95 in
> > dialog-simulation.c) using gcc 2.95.3 on NetBSD/sparc.
>
> I can still reproduce it with gcc version 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian
> prerelease) on i386:
>...
> Given that you can build gnumeric with gcc 2.95.3 on NetBSD/sparc, it seems
> reasonable to assume the problem is in gcc, not gnumeric. I'll reassign
> accordingly.
I found why the Debian package fails to compile with gcc 2.95, the
following patch fixes the problem:
--- debian/rules.old 2004-01-27 12:14:28.000000000 +0100
+++ debian/rules 2004-01-27 12:14:39.000000000 +0100
@@ -67,7 +67,6 @@
--localstatedir=/var/lib \
--libexecdir=/usr/bin \
--enable-compile-warnings=minimum \
- --enable-iso-c \
$(features)
ifeq ($(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE), $(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE))
After applying this patch and adding the small diff from Gnumeric
bug 131967 [1] (already fixed in upstream cvs) Gnumeric compiles with
gcc 2.95.
You might argue whether there's a bug in gc 2.95 with -ansi involved,
but since gcc 2.95 is a dead branch there's not much use in a bug
against gcc-2.95.
It's your choice whether you prefer to apply this patch or to leave this
bug as wontfix.
> Ray
cu
Adrian
[1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131967
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
