Your message dated Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:58:59 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#225186: Acknowledgement (g++-3.3: error compiling max
value for a long long)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2003 05:41:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 26 23:41:52 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.canberrawines.com.au (mailhost.netspeed.com.au)
[203.31.48.33]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Aa4iv-0004Tx-00; Fri, 26 Dec 2003 21:02:41 -0600
Received: from sun (unverified [203.22.237.63])
by mailhost.netspeed.com.au (SurgeMail 1.6b) with ESMTP id 11838627
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 27 Dec 2003 14:04:43 +1100
Received: from jim by sun with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1Aa4is-0001Rn-00; Sat, 27 Dec 2003 14:02:38 +1100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jim Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: g++-3.3: error compiling max value for a long long
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 14:02:38 +1100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
X-Spam-Level:
Package: g++-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.2-4
Severity: normal
Tags: sid
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: sparc
Kernel: Linux sun 2.4.18 #1 SMP Mon Jan 27 14:07:39 EST 2003 sparc64
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US
Versions of packages g++-3.3 depends on:
ii gcc-3.3 1:3.3.2-4 The GNU C compiler
ii gcc-3.3-base 1:3.3.2-4 The GNU Compiler Collection (base
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libstdc++5-3.3-dev 1:3.3.2-4 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (d
-- no debconf information
This gives an error on g++-3.3
and warnings on gcc-3.3 or g++ with -fpermissive.
I think the max value is correct because max + 1 --> negative max.
The program output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/645/sal$ ./type_test
max + 1 = -9223372036854775808
max - 1 = 9223372036854775806
max = 9223372036854775807, size = 8
The compiler messages:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/645/sal$ g++ -o type_test type_test.c
type_test.c: In function nt main()':
type_test.c:7: error: integer constant is too large for "long" type
type_test.c:8: error: integer constant is too large for "long" type
type_test.c:9: error: integer constant is too large for "long" type
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/645/sal$ g++ -fpermissive -o type_test type_test.c
type_test.c: In function nt main()':
type_test.c:7: warning: integer constant is too large for "long" type
type_test.c:8: warning: integer constant is too large for "long" type
type_test.c:9: warning: integer constant is too large for "long" type
The code:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/645/sal$ cat type_test.c
#include <stdio.h>
typedef long long sal_Int64;
sal_Int64 bit64;
#define SAL_MAX_INT64 ((sal_Int64) 0x7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF)
int main(void)
{
bit64 = SAL_MAX_INT64 ;
printf("max + 1\t =\t%lld\n", SAL_MAX_INT64 + 1);
printf("max - 1\t =\t %lld\n", SAL_MAX_INT64 - 1);
printf("max\t =\t %lld, size = %d\n", bit64, sizeof(sal_Int64));
return(0);
}
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 225186-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Dec 2003 10:14:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 29 04:13:37 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AauFe-0006rG-00; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 04:03:54 -0600
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA13571;
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:58:59 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id hBT9wx6R018790;
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:58:59 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:58:59 +0100
To: Jim Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#225186: Acknowledgement (g++-3.3: error compiling max value
for a long long)
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_28
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_28
X-Spam-Level:
Jim Watson writes:
> This was fixed by adding "LL" after the constant values. sorry about the
> inconvenience, i guess it is "invalid"
closing the report.
