Your message dated Sat, 1 Nov 2003 08:59:29 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#218459: gcc: duplicate declaration of va_list has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Oct 2003 14:13:19 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 31 08:13:15 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from faure.debian.org [146.82.138.58] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AFa1Y-0004Sp-00; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 08:13:12 -0600 Received: from mag by faure.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AFa1X-0001q5-00; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 08:13:11 -0600 From: "Magossa'nyi A'rpa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: gcc: duplicate declaration of va_list X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 08:13:10 -0600 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_70,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_28 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_28 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: gcc Version: 2:2.95.4-14 Severity: minor When compiling libzorpll on alpha, I got the following warning. I don't know if it is a libc or gcc bug, I file it against gcc, because libc uses #ifdef __USE_XOPEN # ifdef __GNUC__ # ifndef _VA_LIST_DEFINED libc version: ii libc6.1-dev 2.2.5-11.5 and the warning: In file included from /usr/include/resolv.h:62, from main.c:49: /usr/include/stdio.h:70: warning: redefinition of `va_list' /usr/lib/gcc-lib/alpha-linux/2.95.4/include/va-alpha.h:36: warning: `va_list' previously declared here -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: alpha Kernel: Linux faure 2.2.17 #1 Thu Sep 28 21:31:08 EST 2000 alpha Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages gcc depends on: ii cpp 2:2.95.4-14 The GNU C preprocessor. ii cpp-2.95 1:2.95.4-11woody1 The GNU C preprocessor. ii gcc-2.95 1:2.95.4-11woody1 The GNU C compiler. --------------------------------------- Received: (at 218459-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Nov 2003 08:02:46 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 01 02:02:45 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AFqib-0000fv-00; Sat, 01 Nov 2003 02:02:45 -0600 Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1]) by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA18860; Sat, 1 Nov 2003 08:59:29 +0100 (MET) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id hA17xTlW015093; Sat, 1 Nov 2003 08:59:29 +0100 (MET) From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 08:59:29 +0100 To: Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#218459: gcc: duplicate declaration of va_list In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=4.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_31 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_31 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Falk Hueffner writes: > "Magossa'nyi A'rpa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > When compiling libzorpll on alpha, I got the following > > warning. > > > > In file included from /usr/include/resolv.h:62, > > from main.c:49: > > /usr/include/stdio.h:70: warning: redefinition of `va_list' > > /usr/lib/gcc-lib/alpha-linux/2.95.4/include/va-alpha.h:36: warning: > > `va_list' previously declared here > > This is fixed in 3.x; I'm not sure whether it is worth leaving this > bug report open, since most likely nobody is going to bother fixing > it... currently I do close all reports fixed in a specific version, if this version becomes the default version. The fixed tag is misused for bugs in a gcc version in Debian which is not yet the default version.